Will the Iran war turn President s 1980s boom into a 1970s stagflation? Only if it drags out, which the president says he plans to avoid. But the enemy gets a vote too, as the saying goes, so what if its a long conflict?
As soon as Trump started bombing Iran, markets fell â especially growth stocks like AI. Silver plunged. Bonds fell. Even gold is now down nearly 3%, having replaced its initial war pop with an ominous flight to dollars you see in recessions.
Oil jumped 10% in two days, from $67 to $74 per barrel on the way to $86 as of writing.
Markets always react fast â and they can overreact. The question for the wider economy is how long the war disrupts .
About 20% of global oil exports pass the narrow that is next to Iran. Another 30% are in range of Iranian missiles in the Gulf of Oman and Red Sea.
The U.S. actually imports almost none of this â Middle East oil is just 2% of American oil consumption. But oil markets are global, so Middle East disruption drives prices up worldwide.
On the initial attack, ship plunged by 70%, according to MarineTraffic. By March 3, it ground to a “total halt,” according to Lloyds List.
Trump then ordered the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation to provide for maritime trade through the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz.
This will help by removing risk to shippers. But traffic is unlikely to fully recover until the campaign ends.
Trump is currently suggesting the war might take just four weeks. But the administration is also messaging the war will go “as long as it takes.”
Promising a could be tactical, to demoralize the Iranian regime. But opinion polls show the American people have very little appetite for a long war.
A recent CBS poll found a war lasting fewer than eight weeks is +52 in the polls, while a war that lasts longer than that is -8. Polling would likely get worse if American casualties mount.
In terms of , there will only be real fallout if the war drags on. And that falls into three baskets: growth, jobs and inflation.
Historically, every $10 rise in oil knocks about two-tenths of a percent off economic growth. That’s small in an economy that’s growing over 3%, according to the . It might lower annual wage growth by about $300, given the $19 oil has already risen.
Still, that goes on top of expensive oil to heat your home or gas your car. AAA says gasoline prices have already jumped nearly 20%, from $2.98 to $3.56. Between gasoline, transport costs and utilities, that might bump inflation another six-tenths of a percent â translating into .
Meanwhile, higher oil prices and slower growth both hit job creation â given the move weve already seen, they might drop job creation by 15,000 to 20,000 per month.
So it’s painful. But it’s not a recession.
What would put us in recession is a long war. A recent study by Deutsche Bank looked at historic oil shocks, concluding you need a 50% to 100% sustained jump in oil to set off a recession.
This would imply oil prices between $100 and $150 that remained high.
Even then, according to Deutsche, oil only causes recession when the economy is already limping. For example, the 1970s is the poster child for an oil crash. But the U.S. economy was already stagflationary because of Washington’s so-called guns and butter policy of fighting Vietnam while building a trillion-dollar welfare state. This drove the “Nixon Shock,” which pre-dated the oil embargo by several years.
In contrast, when the bombs started, the Feds GDPNow was at a healthy 3% on GDP growth and the most recent productivity was 4.9% â one of the highest since the Reagan boom.
This means $100 oil could knock us into the 1% area on growth. But its unlikely to spark a recession unless the Fed panics on oil inflation and hikes rates. Which could mow down enough jobs to tip us over the edge.
For now, the . But if the wa
