As Minnesotas fraud scandal continues to make headlines, signature legislation signed by Gov. extending the amount of paid leave available to Minnesota workers is already causing major headaches and concerns from critics worried about potential abuse of even more dollars.
The legislation, which took effect on January 1, allows Minnesota workers up to 12 weeks a year off with partial pay to care for a newborn or a sick family member, and up to 12 weeks to recover from their own serious illness. Benefits are capped at 20 weeks a year for employees who take advantage of both.
Two months in, the legislation is already receiving pushback, including from the state’s largest, non-partisan business advocacy organization.
“Beyond just anti-fraud sentiments, employers are reporting a few concerning trends,” Lauryn Schothorst from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce told Fox 9 Minneapolis.
“Providers are being pressured by patients for the full 12 weeks of leave, even if their condition does not require it. A number of respondents have shared that their employees are making more on paid leave than the wage replacement thresholds in law. Employees are going on vacation or to music festivals while supposedly on leave. These anecdotes don’t necessarily reveal fraud or a lack of oversight by the department. They highlight concerns with the broad eligibility and limited employer recourse elements of the law. To employers, overuse is abuse.”
Two Republican lawmakers who spoke to Fox News Digital agreed with that assessment.
“The chamber is right,” State Sen. Michael Holmstrom said. “Minnesota is not a business-friendly state. Employers were already offering this benefit and then the state got in between employers and their employees, which it has no business doing.”
Holmstrom says a major employer in his district has seen a 700% increase in paid leave usage since the law took effect and the company is unable to backfill those positions with skilled workers to compensate.
The result, Holmstrom explained, is carrying on with business as usual without replacements and providing a lower level of service.Â
State Sen. Mark Koran told Fox News Digital he also agreed with the chamber and suggested fraud concerns are valid, saying there will be “no real enforcement” because the “state removed the employer from the oversight and administration of the program.”
Koran explained: “The program isnt being used as intended, which Republicans predicted. It was sold as a replacement for short and long-term leave replacement. Now its a complex sick leave program with the effective date on day one, not the traditional seventh day of injury or illness.”
“The liberal use guidelines mean employees can take a day off every week, or every Monday and Friday for a long weekend. Its a huge negative impact on employers ability to find substitute labor and puts Minnesota in the bottom tier of business competitiveness.”
Ultimately, Koran says the law will result in fewer jobs, lower pay, decreased benefits and a “continued exodus of business creation and expansion out of Minnesota.”
“No way,” Brian McClung, former spokesperson for former Republican Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty posted on X. “I am shocked – shocked! If only someone had warned the MN Democrat trifecta that creating an expensive, cumbersome, bureaucratic system might go badly (when the vast majority of businesses already offered paid leave without a mandate).”
Fox News Digital reached out to Walzs office for comment.
The new state paid leave program is being enforced by a
